[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1526485176.61700.12.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 08:39:36 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Utility
functions to boost HWP performance limits
On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 12:43 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:15:09AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > So if the "cached" thing is the last "not boosted EPP", that's why
> > it
> > is not updated here.
>
> Sure, I see what it does, just saying that naming and comments are
> wrong
> vs the actual code.
I will fix in the next revision.
Thanks,
Srinivas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists