[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180517221626.13045-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 15:16:26 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jiri@...nulli.us, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH net] net: dsa: Do not register devlink for unused ports
Even if commit 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports") indicated
that registering a devlink instance for unused ports is not a problem, and this
is true, this can be confusing nonetheless, so let's not do it.
Fixes: 1d27732f411d ("net: dsa: setup and teardown ports")
Reported-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index adf50fbc4c13..cc45a8ca45fb 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -262,13 +262,14 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
memset(&dp->devlink_port, 0, sizeof(dp->devlink_port));
+ if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+ return 0;
+
err = devlink_port_register(ds->devlink, &dp->devlink_port, dp->index);
if (err)
return err;
switch (dp->type) {
- case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
- break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
err = dsa_port_link_register_of(dp);
@@ -293,11 +294,12 @@ static int dsa_port_setup(struct dsa_port *dp)
static void dsa_port_teardown(struct dsa_port *dp)
{
+ if (dp->type == DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED)
+ return;
+
devlink_port_unregister(&dp->devlink_port);
switch (dp->type) {
- case DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED:
- break;
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_CPU:
case DSA_PORT_TYPE_DSA:
dsa_port_link_unregister_of(dp);
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists