linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180517163600.4d3e585d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 16:36:00 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  mm/vmalloc.c

between commits:

  fddda2b7b521 ("proc: introduce proc_create_seq{,_data}")
  44414d82cfe0 ("proc: introduce proc_create_seq_private")

from the vfs tree and patch:

  "mm: use octal not symbolic permissions"

from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc mm/vmalloc.c
index 89efac3a020e,abf54a3e71e6..000000000000
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@@ -2738,14 -2738,25 +2738,14 @@@ static const struct seq_operations vmal
  	.show = s_show,
  };
  
 -static int vmalloc_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 +static int __init proc_vmalloc_init(void)
  {
  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA))
- 		proc_create_seq_private("vmallocinfo", S_IRUSR, NULL,
 -		return seq_open_private(file, &vmalloc_op,
 -					nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int));
++		proc_create_seq_private("vmallocinfo", 0400, NULL,
 +				&vmalloc_op,
 +				nr_node_ids * sizeof(unsigned int), NULL);
  	else
- 		proc_create_seq("vmallocinfo", S_IRUSR, NULL, &vmalloc_op);
 -		return seq_open(file, &vmalloc_op);
 -}
 -
 -static const struct file_operations proc_vmalloc_operations = {
 -	.open		= vmalloc_open,
 -	.read		= seq_read,
 -	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
 -	.release	= seq_release_private,
 -};
 -
 -static int __init proc_vmalloc_init(void)
 -{
 -	proc_create("vmallocinfo", 0400, NULL, &proc_vmalloc_operations);
++		proc_create_seq("vmallocinfo", 0400, NULL, &vmalloc_op);
  	return 0;
  }
  module_init(proc_vmalloc_init);

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped