[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a3ce1af5-7b99-38db-fc51-4d580db1e87e@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 10:48:14 +0300
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
Cc: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Adrian Salido <salidoa@...gle.com>,
Jason Gerecke <killertofu@...il.com>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Upstreaming Team <linux@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] i2c-hid: ELAN Touchpad does not work on ASUS X580GD
Hi
On 05/15/2018 01:20 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 05/15/2018 06:22 AM, Chris Chiu wrote:
>> What if I change the 120MHz to 180MHz and then make sure that the I2C
>> operates
>> in target FS mode frequency 400kHz via scope? Would there be any side
>> effect?
>> Maybe some other busses frequency could be also affected and causing
>> some other
>> component malfunction?
>>
> Should be safe. It is only clock rate information when registering a
> fixed clock with known rate in intel-lpss.c and i2c-designware uses that
> info when calculating the timing parameters. I.e. it doesn't change any
> internal clocks.
>
> I'm trying to find a contact who can confirm what is the expected rate
> of I2C input clock and is it common to all Cannon Lake HW.
>
I got confirmation that input clock is actually even higher 216 Mhz.
While checking does it cover all of those CNL CNL-LP and CNL-H PCI IDs
may I add your Jian-Hong, Chris and Daniel email addresses to Repored-by
tags in a fix patch?
--
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists