[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180517091002.GH25318@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 11:10:02 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 159/190] ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec
always
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 02:58:02PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-04-11 at 20:36 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
> >
> > commit 3f29770723fe498a5c5f57c3a31a996ebdde03e1 upstream.
> [...]
>
> This leaves the error paths in esp{4,6}.c leaking memory; fixed
> upstream by:
>
> commit e6194923237f3952b955c343b65b211f36bce01c
> Author: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> Date: Thu Jul 13 09:13:30 2017 +0200
>
> esp: Fix memleaks on error paths.
Really? That patch doesn't apply at all. It looks like this patch
fixes things that happened after the above patch.
Or am I confused?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists