linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Don't restrict kthread to related

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 12:32:29 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "cpufreq: schedutil: Don't restrict kthread to related_cpus unnecessarily"

On Wednesday, May 9, 2018 6:55:27 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-05-18, 08:33, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > This reverts commit e2cabe48c20efb174ce0c01190f8b9c5f3ea1d13.
> > 
> > Lifting the restriction that the sugov kthread is bound to the
> > policy->related_cpus for a system with a slow switching cpufreq driver,
> > which is able to perform DVFS from any cpu (e.g. cpufreq-dt), is not
> > only not beneficial it also harms Enery-Aware Scheduling (EAS) on
> > systems with asymmetric cpu capacities (e.g. Arm big.LITTLE).
> > 
> > The sugov kthread which does the update for the little cpus could
> > potentially run on a big cpu. It could prevent that the big cluster goes
> > into deeper idle states although all the tasks are running on the little
> > cluster.
> > 
> > Example: hikey960 w/ 4.16.0-rc6-+
> >          Arm big.LITTLE with per-cluster DVFS
> > 
> > root@...0:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep "^CPU part"
> > CPU part        : 0xd03 (Cortex-A53, little cpu)
> > CPU part        : 0xd03
> > CPU part        : 0xd03
> > CPU part        : 0xd03
> > CPU part        : 0xd09 (Cortex-A73, big cpu)
> > CPU part        : 0xd09
> > CPU part        : 0xd09
> > CPU part        : 0xd09
> > 
> > root@...0:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq# ls
> > policy0  policy4  schedutil
> > 
> > root@...0:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq# cat policy*/related_cpus
> > 0 1 2 3
> > 4 5 6 7
> > 
> > (1) w/o the revert:
> > 
> > root@...0:~# ps -eo pid,class,rtprio,pri,psr,comm | awk 'NR == 1 ||
> > /sugov/'
> >   PID CLS RTPRIO PRI PSR COMMAND
> >   1489 #6      0 140   1 sugov:0
> >   1490 #6      0 140   0 sugov:4
> > 
> > The sugov kthread sugov:4 responsible for policy4 runs on cpu0. (In this
> > case both sugov kthreads run on little cpus).
> > 
> > cross policy (cluster) remote callback example:
> > ...
> > migration/1-14 [001] enqueue_task_fair: this_cpu=1 cpu_of(rq)=5
> > migration/1-14 [001] sugov_update_shared: this_cpu=1 sg_cpu->cpu=5
> >                      sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
> >   sugov:4-1490 [000] sugov_work: this_cpu=0
> >                      sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
> > ...
> > 
> > The remote callback (this_cpu=1, target_cpu=5) is executed on cpu=0.
> > 
> > (2) w/ the revert:
> > 
> > root@...0:~# ps -eo pid,class,rtprio,pri,psr,comm | awk 'NR == 1 ||
> > /sugov/'
> >   PID CLS RTPRIO PRI PSR COMMAND
> >   1491 #6      0 140   2 sugov:0
> >   1492 #6      0 140   4 sugov:4
> > 
> > The sugov kthread sugov:4 responsible for policy4 runs on cpu4.
> > 
> > cross policy (cluster) remote callback example:
> > ...
> > migration/1-14 [001] enqueue_task_fair: this_cpu=1 cpu_of(rq)=7
> > migration/1-14 [001] sugov_update_shared: this_cpu=1 sg_cpu->cpu=7
> >                      sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
> >   sugov:4-1492 [004] sugov_work: this_cpu=4
> >                      sg_cpu->sg_policy->policy->related_cpus=4-7
> > ...
> > 
> > The remote callback (this_cpu=1, target_cpu=7) is executed on cpu=4.
> > 
> > Now the sugov kthread executes again on the policy (cluster) for which
> > the Operating Performance Point (OPP) should be changed.
> > It avoids the problem that an otherwise idle policy (cluster) is running
> > schedutil (the sugov kthread) for another one.
> > 
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
> > Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
> > Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +-----
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > index d2c6083304b4..63014cff76a5 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > @@ -523,11 +523,7 @@ static int sugov_kthread_create(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	sg_policy->thread = thread;
> > -
> > -	/* Kthread is bound to all CPUs by default */
> > -	if (!policy->dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu)
> > -		kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
> > -
> > +	kthread_bind_mask(thread, policy->related_cpus);
> >  	init_irq_work(&sg_policy->irq_work, sugov_irq_work);
> >  	mutex_init(&sg_policy->work_lock);
> >  
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Applied, thanks!