[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180517153323.GA8586@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 17:33:24 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>,
Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@....ntt.co.jp>,
"Tobin C . Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace
I didn't read this series yet, and I don't even understand what are you
trying to do, just one question...
On 05/17, Tycho Andersen wrote:
>
> +static struct file *init_listener(struct task_struct *task,
> + struct seccomp_filter *filter)
> +{
> + struct file *ret = ERR_PTR(-EBUSY);
> + struct seccomp_filter *cur;
> + bool have_listener = false;
> +
> + for (cur = task->seccomp.filter; cur; cur = cur->prev) {
> + mutex_lock(&cur->notify_lock);
Did you test this patch with CONFIG_LOCKDEP ?
>From lockdep pov this loop tries to take the same lock twice or more, it shoul
complain.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists