lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180517050406.GF20254@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 17 May 2018 14:04:06 +0900
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@...rochip.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
        richard.genoud@...il.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: at91-usart: add driver for at91-usart as spi

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:38:21PM +0300, Radu Pirea wrote:

> +config SPI_AT91_USART
> +        tristate "Atmel USART Controller as SPI"
> +	depends on HAS_DMA
> +	depends on (ARCH_AT91 || COMPILE_TEST)
> +        select MFD_AT91_USART
> +	help
> +	  This selects a driver for the AT91 USART Controller as SPI Master,
> +	  present on AT91 and SAMA5 SoC series.
> +

This looks like there's some tab/space mixing going on here.

> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Driver for AT91 USART Controllers as SPI
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Microchip Technology Inc.

Make the entire block a C++ comment so it looks more intentional rather
tha mixing C and C++.

> +static inline void at91_usart_spi_tx(struct at91_usart_spi *aus)
> +{
> +	unsigned int len = aus->current_transfer->len;
> +	unsigned int remaining = aus->current_tx_remaining_bytes;
> +	const u8  *tx_buf = aus->current_transfer->tx_buf;
> +
> +	if (tx_buf && remaining) {
> +		if (at91_usart_spi_tx_ready(aus))
> +			spi_writel(aus, THR, tx_buf[len - remaining]);
> +			aus->current_tx_remaining_bytes--;

Missing braces here - we only write to the FIFO if there's space but we
unconditionally decrement the counter.

> +	} else {
> +		if (at91_usart_spi_tx_ready(aus))
> +			spi_writel(aus, THR, US_DUMMY_TX);
> +	}
> +}

This looks like you're open coding SPI_CONTROLLER_MUST_TX

> +	int len = aus->current_transfer->len;
> +	int remaining = aus->current_rx_remaining_bytes;
> +	u8  *rx_buf = aus->current_transfer->rx_buf;
> +
> +	if (aus->current_rx_remaining_bytes) {
> +		rx_buf[len - remaining] = spi_readb(aus, RHR);
> +		aus->current_rx_remaining_bytes--;
> +	} else {
> +		spi_readb(aus, RHR);
> +	}

Similarly for _MUST_RX.

> +	controller->flags = SPI_MASTER_MUST_RX | SPI_MASTER_MUST_TX;

You're actually setting both flags...  this means that the handling for
cases with missing TX or RX buffers can't happen.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ