[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180517051447.GS13271@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 10:44:47 +0530
From: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...aro.org>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, eric.long@...eadtrum.com,
broonie@...nel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dmaengine: sprd: Add Spreadtrum DMA configuration
On 11-05-18, 21:06, Baolin Wang wrote:
> +struct sprd_dma_config {
> + struct dma_slave_config cfg;
> + u32 block_len;
> + u32 transcation_len;
/s/transcation/transaction
now in code I see block_len and this filled by len which is sg_dma_len()?
So why two varibales when you are using only one.
Second, you are storing parameters programmed thru _prep call into
_dma_config. That is not correct.
We use these to store channel parameters and NOT transaction parameters which
would differ with each txn. No wonder you can only support only 1 txn :)
Lastly, if these are same values why not use src/dstn_max_burst?
> +static enum sprd_dma_datawidth
> +sprd_dma_get_datawidth(enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth)
> +{
> + switch (buswidth) {
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE:
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES:
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES:
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES:
> + return ffs(buswidth) - 1;
> + default:
> + return SPRD_DMA_DATAWIDTH_4_BYTES;
Does default make sense, should we error out?
> +static u32 sprd_dma_get_step(enum dma_slave_buswidth buswidth)
> +{
> + switch (buswidth) {
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE:
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES:
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES:
> + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES:
> + return buswidth;
> +
> + default:
> + return SPRD_DMA_DWORD_STEP;
Does default make sense, should we error out?
> +static int sprd_dma_config(struct dma_chan *chan, struct sprd_dma_desc *sdesc,
> + dma_addr_t src, dma_addr_t dst,
> + struct sprd_dma_config *slave_cfg)
> +{
> + struct sprd_dma_dev *sdev = to_sprd_dma_dev(chan);
> + struct sprd_dma_chn *schan = to_sprd_dma_chan(chan);
> + struct sprd_dma_chn_hw *hw = &sdesc->chn_hw;
> + u32 fix_mode = 0, fix_en = 0, wrap_en = 0, wrap_mode = 0;
> + u32 src_datawidth, dst_datawidth, temp;
> +
> + if (slave_cfg->cfg.slave_id)
> + schan->dev_id = slave_cfg->cfg.slave_id;
> +
> + hw->cfg = SPRD_DMA_DONOT_WAIT_BDONE << SPRD_DMA_WAIT_BDONE_OFFSET;
> +
> + temp = slave_cfg->wrap_ptr & SPRD_DMA_LOW_ADDR_MASK;
> + temp |= (src >> SPRD_DMA_HIGH_ADDR_OFFSET) & SPRD_DMA_HIGH_ADDR_MASK;
> + hw->wrap_ptr = temp;
> +
> + temp = slave_cfg->wrap_to & SPRD_DMA_LOW_ADDR_MASK;
> + temp |= (dst >> SPRD_DMA_HIGH_ADDR_OFFSET) & SPRD_DMA_HIGH_ADDR_MASK;
> + hw->wrap_to = temp;
> +
> + hw->src_addr = src & SPRD_DMA_LOW_ADDR_MASK;
> + hw->des_addr = dst & SPRD_DMA_LOW_ADDR_MASK;
> +
> + if ((slave_cfg->src_step != 0 && slave_cfg->dst_step != 0)
> + || (slave_cfg->src_step | slave_cfg->dst_step) == 0) {
this check doesnt seem right to me, what are you trying here?
> + fix_en = 0;
> + } else {
> + fix_en = 1;
> + if (slave_cfg->src_step)
> + fix_mode = 1;
> + else
> + fix_mode = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (slave_cfg->wrap_ptr && slave_cfg->wrap_to) {
> + wrap_en = 1;
> + if (slave_cfg->wrap_to == src) {
> + wrap_mode = 0;
> + } else if (slave_cfg->wrap_to == dst) {
> + wrap_mode = 1;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(sdev->dma_dev.dev, "invalid wrap mode\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + hw->intc = slave_cfg->int_mode | SPRD_DMA_CFG_ERR_INT_EN;
> +
> + src_datawidth = sprd_dma_get_datawidth(slave_cfg->cfg.src_addr_width);
> + dst_datawidth = sprd_dma_get_datawidth(slave_cfg->cfg.dst_addr_width);
> +
> + temp = src_datawidth << SPRD_DMA_SRC_DATAWIDTH_OFFSET;
> + temp |= dst_datawidth << SPRD_DMA_DES_DATAWIDTH_OFFSET;
> + temp |= slave_cfg->req_mode << SPRD_DMA_REQ_MODE_OFFSET;
> + temp |= wrap_mode << SPRD_DMA_WRAP_SEL_OFFSET;
> + temp |= wrap_en << SPRD_DMA_WRAP_EN_OFFSET;
> + temp |= fix_mode << SPRD_DMA_FIX_SEL_OFFSET;
> + temp |= fix_en << SPRD_DMA_FIX_EN_OFFSET;
> + temp |= slave_cfg->cfg.src_maxburst & SPRD_DMA_FRG_LEN_MASK;
> + hw->frg_len = temp;
> +
> + hw->blk_len = slave_cfg->block_len & SPRD_DMA_BLK_LEN_MASK;
> + hw->trsc_len = slave_cfg->transcation_len & SPRD_DMA_TRSC_LEN_MASK;
> +
> + temp = (slave_cfg->dst_step & SPRD_DMA_TRSF_STEP_MASK) <<
> + SPRD_DMA_DEST_TRSF_STEP_OFFSET;
> + temp |= (slave_cfg->src_step & SPRD_DMA_TRSF_STEP_MASK) <<
> + SPRD_DMA_SRC_TRSF_STEP_OFFSET;
> + hw->trsf_step = temp;
> +
> + hw->frg_step = 0;
> + hw->src_blk_step = 0;
> + hw->des_blk_step = 0;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> +sprd_dma_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> + unsigned int sglen, enum dma_transfer_direction dir,
> + unsigned long flags, void *context)
> +{
> + struct sprd_dma_chn *schan = to_sprd_dma_chan(chan);
> + struct sprd_dma_config *slave_cfg = &schan->slave_cfg;
> + u32 src_step = 0, dst_step = 0, len = 0;
> + dma_addr_t src = 0, dst = 0;
> + struct sprd_dma_desc *sdesc;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + int ret, i;
> +
> + /* TODO: now we only support one sg for each DMA configuration. */
> + if (!is_slave_direction(dir) || sglen > 1)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + sdesc = kzalloc(sizeof(*sdesc), GFP_NOWAIT);
> + if (!sdesc)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + for_each_sg(sgl, sg, sglen, i) {
> + len = sg_dma_len(sg);
> +
> + if (dir == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) {
> + src = sg_dma_address(sg);
> + dst = slave_cfg->cfg.dst_addr;
> + src_step = sprd_dma_get_step(slave_cfg->cfg.src_addr_width);
> + dst_step = SPRD_DMA_NONE_STEP;
> + } else {
> + src = slave_cfg->cfg.src_addr;
> + dst = sg_dma_address(sg);
> + src_step = SPRD_DMA_NONE_STEP;
> + dst_step = sprd_dma_get_step(slave_cfg->cfg.dst_addr_width);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + sprd_dma_fill_config(slave_cfg, src_step, dst_step, len, flags);
> +
> + ret = sprd_dma_config(chan, sdesc, src, dst, slave_cfg);
> + if (ret) {
> + kfree(sdesc);
> + return NULL;
> + }
Am more intrigued here, the above call fills you config struct but you do not
use it.. so what is the use of that.
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists