[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k1s2j0x2.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 00:39:37 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Gargi Sharma <gs051095@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pid: Export find_task_by_vpid for use in external modules
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> writes:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:39:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On 10 May 2018 at 02:40, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> > This does not leak information from other namespaces because of the
>> > uniqueness of the global PID. However, what it does leak is the value
>> > of the global PID which is meaningless in the namespace. So, before
>> > the event stream is delivered to userspace, this value needs to be
>> > re-written to the namespace's PID value.
>>
>> Unfortunately that can't be done. The trace stream is compressed and
>> needs to be decompressed using an external library. I think the only
>> option is to return an error if a user is trying to use this feature
>> from a namespace.
>
> That sounds like a sensible approach, and that should get rid of the
> vpid stuff too.
>
> Eric, would this solve all your concerns?
It does, and I have given my ack to the respin.
I am moderately concerned about using the global pid with hardware. But
pids are a core abstraction that aren't going anywhere. As long as
hardware does not impose constraints on pids that software already does
not we should be fine.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists