[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5AFDD52D.2000201@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 12:17:01 -0700
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>, robh@...nel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Nischal <anischal@...eaurora.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [v0 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: Introduce QCOM CPUFREQ FW bindings
On 05/17/2018 03:14 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> + Rob.
>
> On 17-05-18, 15:00, Taniya Das wrote:
>> Add QCOM cpufreq firmware device bindings for Qualcomm Technology Inc's
>> SoCs. This is required for managing the cpu frequency transitions which are
>> controlled by firmware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-fw.txt | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-fw.txt
Isn't the prefix wrong? Shouldn't it be dt-bindings: cpufreq:?
-Saravana
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists