linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Fix handling of min/max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180518174954.GC29467@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 10:49:54 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / devfreq: Fix handling of min/max_freq == 0

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 08:27:55AM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please resend the patch with related other patches.
> It is hard to check the dependency/sequence of your patches.

The three patches (excluding the RFC) I sent in the past days are
independent from each other and can be applied individually in no
particular order.

I encountered and fixed the issues one after another, when I sent the
first or second patch I didn't know there would be another
one. Anyway, I'll resend as a series together with other patches,
unless some of the patches get applied before.

Thanks

Matthias