linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: bug: prevent gcc distortions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzbWA1XJTitwX6DvHxr7EqDa-tEjpedn5yfYpC1edYQog@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 11:25:32 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     namit@...are.com
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] x86: bug: prevent gcc distortions

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:24 AM Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com> wrote:

> Will it be ok just to use a global inline asm to set an “.include”
directive
> that gas would later process? (I can probably wrap it in a C macro so it
> won’t be too disgusting)

Maybe. I'd almost prefer it to be the automatic kind of thing that we
already do for C files using "-include".

                  Linus