[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74c096ca-1ad1-799e-df3d-7b1b099333a7@schaufler-ca.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 17:24:36 -0700
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] security: define security_kernel_read_blob()
wrapper
On 5/17/2018 7:48 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> In order for LSMs and IMA-appraisal to differentiate between the original
> and new syscalls (eg. kexec, kernel modules, firmware), both the original
> and new syscalls must call an LSM hook.
>
> Commit 2e72d51b4ac3 ("security: introduce kernel_module_from_file hook")
> introduced calling security_kernel_module_from_file() in both the original
> and new syscalls. Commit a1db74209483 ("module: replace
> copy_module_from_fd with kernel version") replaced these LSM calls with
> security_kernel_read_file().
>
> Commit e40ba6d56b41 ("firmware: replace call to fw_read_file_contents()
> with kernel version") and commit b804defe4297 ("kexec: replace call to
> copy_file_from_fd() with kernel version") replaced their own version of
> reading a file from the kernel with the generic
> kernel_read_file_from_path/fd() versions, which call the pre and post
> security_kernel_read_file LSM hooks.
>
> Missing are LSM calls in the original kexec syscall and firmware sysfs
> fallback method. From a technical perspective there is no justification
> for defining a new LSM hook, as the existing security_kernel_read_file()
> works just fine. The original syscalls, however, do not read a file, so
> the security hook name is inappropriate. Instead of defining a new LSM
> hook, this patch defines security_kernel_read_blob() as a wrapper for
> the existing LSM security_kernel_file_read() hook.
What a marvelous opportunity to bikeshed!
I really dislike adding another security_ interface just because
the name isn't quite right. Especially a wrapper, which is just
code and execution overhead. Why not change security_kernel_read_file()
to security_kernel_read_blob() everywhere and be done?
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
>
> Changelog v2:
> - Define a generic wrapper named security_kernel_read_blob() for
> security_kernel_read_file().
>
> Changelog v1:
> - Define and call security_kexec_load(), a wrapper for
> security_kernel_read_file().
> ---
> include/linux/security.h | 6 ++++++
> security/security.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 63030c85ee19..4db1967a688b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ int security_kernel_module_request(char *kmod_name);
> int security_kernel_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id id);
> int security_kernel_post_read_file(struct file *file, char *buf, loff_t size,
> enum kernel_read_file_id id);
> +int security_kernel_read_blob(enum kernel_read_file_id id);
> int security_task_fix_setuid(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old,
> int flags);
> int security_task_setpgid(struct task_struct *p, pid_t pgid);
> @@ -922,6 +923,11 @@ static inline int security_kernel_post_read_file(struct file *file,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int security_kernel_read_blob(enum kernel_read_file_id id)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static inline int security_task_fix_setuid(struct cred *new,
> const struct cred *old,
> int flags)
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 68f46d849abe..8f199b2bf4a2 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -1044,6 +1044,12 @@ int security_kernel_read_file(struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id id)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(security_kernel_read_file);
>
> +int security_kernel_read_blob(enum kernel_read_file_id id)
> +{
> + return security_kernel_read_file(NULL, id);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(security_kernel_read_blob);
> +
> int security_kernel_post_read_file(struct file *file, char *buf, loff_t size,
> enum kernel_read_file_id id)
> {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists