[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180518184630.axfa7oq4pewb7foj@kazak>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 20:46:32 +0200
From: Ralph Böhme <slow@...ba.org>
To: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc: CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2][SMB3] Add kernel trace support
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 09:36:36PM -0500, Steve French via samba-technical wrote:
> Patch updated with additional tracepoint locations and some formatting
> improvements. There are some obvious additional tracepoints that could
> be added, but this should be a reasonable group to start with.
>
> From edc02d6f9dc24963d510c7ef59067428d3b082d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 21:16:55 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] smb3: Add ftrace tracepoints for improved SMB3 debugging
>
> Although dmesg logs and wireshark network traces can be
> helpful, being able to dynamically enable/disable tracepoints
> (in this case via the kernel ftrace mechanism) can also be
> helpful in more quickly debugging problems, and more
> selectively tracing the events related to the bug report.
>
> This patch adds 12 ftrace tracepoints to cifs.ko for SMB3 events
> in some obvious locations. Subsequent patches will add more
> as needed.
>
> Example use:
> trace-cmd record -e cifs
> <run test case>
> trace-cmd show
pardon my ignorance, but are these tracepoints usable with other tracing
frameworks like Systemtap?
Last time I checked, Systemtap looked like *the* tool. Is there a generic trace
point infrastructure that tracing tools can consume, so we're not tied to
ftrace?
Thanks!
-slow
--
Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/
Samba Developer, SerNet GmbH https://sernet.de/en/samba/
GPG Key Fingerprint: FAE2 C608 8A24 2520 51C5
59E4 AA1E 9B71 2639 9E46
Powered by blists - more mailing lists