[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd2C2yqHkjV18bNUoaNb08_aAOEJSf5Ycgv9Beq9Ub1oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 23:41:25 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@...ilicon.com>,
Wangbinghui <wangbinghui@...ilicon.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@...wei.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>,
Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
Suzhuangluan <suzhuangluan@...ilicon.com>,
Kongfei <kongfei@...ilicon.com>, Yao Chen <chenyao11@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] PCI: kirin: Add MSI support
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 09:21:59AM +0800, Xiaowei Song wrote:
>> +static void kirin_pcie_msi_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +{
>> + dw_pcie_msi_init(pp);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kirin_pcie_enable_interrupts(struct pcie_port *pp)
>> +{
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
>> + kirin_pcie_msi_init(pp);
>> +}
>
> Why do you need two functons ?
It's probably misreading of my suggestion which is more clearly can look like
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI))
return;
dw_pcie_msi_init(pp);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists