[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdNUW6KoM6oupyQ80A1WVRk7vewwDt6WEZOyjrAUifqRg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 00:21:14 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...mer.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use GPIO lookup table
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Janusz Krzysztofik
<jmkrzyszt@...il.com> wrote:
> + gpiod_rdy = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "rdy", GPIOD_IN);
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(gpiod_rdy)) {
So, is it optional or not at the end?
If it is, why do we check for NULL?
> this->dev_ready = ams_delta_nand_ready;
> } else {
> this->dev_ready = NULL;
> pr_notice("Couldn't request gpio for Delta NAND ready.\n");
dev_notice() ?
> }
> +err_gpiod:
> + if (err == -ENODEV || err == -ENOENT)
> + err = -EPROBE_DEFER;
Hmm...
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists