[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180518062430.GB21711@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 08:24:30 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] mm, huge page: Copy to access sub-page last when
copy huge page
On Fri 18-05-18 11:03:16, Huang, Ying wrote:
[...]
> The patch is a generic optimization which should benefit quite some
> workloads, not for a specific use case. To demonstrate the performance
> benefit of the patch, we tested it with vm-scalability run on
> transparent huge page.
It is also adds quite some non-intuitive code. So is this worth? Does
any _real_ workload benefits from the change?
> include/linux/mm.h | 3 ++-
> mm/huge_memory.c | 3 ++-
> mm/memory.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists