[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180518062638.GD27960@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 08:26:38 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 5/7] x86: kprobes: Ignore break_handler
* Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> Remove break_handler related code since that was used
> only for jprobe and jprobe is removed now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/common.h | 10 ----------
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 13 ++-----------
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c | 16 ++--------------
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Even after this change there's a stale reference to ->break_handler():
arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h: * a post_handler or break_handler).
Please use 'git grep'!
Also, there's no reason to send an incomplete series: please remove _all_
->break_handler() references so that it's 100% gone! The pain of having and not
having ->break_handler() is completely unnecessary.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists