lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 11:38:27 +0300
From:   Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
        Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>,
        Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>,
        Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: intel-lpss: Fix Intel Cannon Lake LPSS I2C input clock

Intel Cannon Lake PCH has much higher 216 MHz input clock to LPSS I2C
than Sunrisepoint which uses 120 MHz. Preliminary information was that
both share the same clock rate but actual silicon implements elevated
rate for better support for 3.4 MHz high-speed I2C.

This incorrect input clock rate results too high I2C bus clock in case
ACPI doesn't provide tuned I2C timing parameters since I2C host
controller driver calculates them from input clock rate.

Fix this by using the correct rate. We still share the same 230 ns SDA
hold time value than Sunrisepoint.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: b418bbff36dd ("mfd: intel-lpss: Add Intel Cannonlake PCI IDs")
Reported-by: Jian-Hong Pan <jian-hong@...lessm.com>
Reported-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@...lessm.com>
Reported-by: Daniel Drake <drake@...lessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
---
Hi Jian-Hong, Chris and Daniel. Could you test does this fix your
touchpad issue?
---
 drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
index d1c46de89eb4..d9ae983095c5 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-pci.c
@@ -124,6 +124,11 @@ static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info apl_i2c_info = {
 	.properties = apl_i2c_properties,
 };
 
+static const struct intel_lpss_platform_info cnl_i2c_info = {
+	.clk_rate = 216000000,
+	.properties = spt_i2c_properties,
+};
+
 static const struct pci_device_id intel_lpss_pci_ids[] = {
 	/* BXT A-Step */
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x0aac), (kernel_ulong_t)&bxt_i2c_info },
@@ -207,13 +212,13 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_lpss_pci_ids[] = {
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9daa), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dab), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dfb), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dc5), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dc6), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dc5), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dc6), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dc7), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9de8), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9de9), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dea), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9deb), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9de8), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9de9), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9dea), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x9deb), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
 	/* SPT-H */
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa127), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa128), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
@@ -240,10 +245,10 @@ static const struct pci_device_id intel_lpss_pci_ids[] = {
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa32b), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa37b), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_info },
 	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa347), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_uart_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa368), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa369), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa36a), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
-	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa36b), (kernel_ulong_t)&spt_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa368), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa369), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa36a), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa36b), (kernel_ulong_t)&cnl_i2c_info },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, intel_lpss_pci_ids);
-- 
2.17.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ