[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180518081532.463671114@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 10:15:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 41/45] xfrm: Use __skb_queue_tail in xfrm_trans_queue
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
commit d16b46e4fd8bc6063624605f25b8c0835bb1fbe3 upstream.
We do not need locking in xfrm_trans_queue because it is designed
to use per-CPU buffers. However, the original code incorrectly
used skb_queue_tail which takes the lock. This patch switches
it to __skb_queue_tail instead.
Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
Fixes: acf568ee859f ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets...")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Strachan <astrachan@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb
return -ENOBUFS;
XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish;
- skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
+ __skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists