lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180518081458.311598151@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 10:15:13 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 17/55] net/tls: Dont recursively call push_record during tls_write_space callbacks

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>

[ Upstream commit c212d2c7fc4736d49be102fb7a1a545cdc2f1fea ]

It is reported that in some cases, write_space may be called in
do_tcp_sendpages, such that we recursively invoke do_tcp_sendpages again:

[  660.468802]  ? do_tcp_sendpages+0x8d/0x580
[  660.468826]  ? tls_push_sg+0x74/0x130 [tls]
[  660.468852]  ? tls_push_record+0x24a/0x390 [tls]
[  660.468880]  ? tls_write_space+0x6a/0x80 [tls]
...

tls_push_sg already does a loop over all sending sg's, so ignore
any tls_write_space notifications until we are done sending.
We then have to call the previous write_space to wake up
poll() waiters after we are done with the send loop.

Reported-by: Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
Signed-off-by: Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/net/tls.h  |    1 +
 net/tls/tls_main.c |    7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

--- a/include/net/tls.h
+++ b/include/net/tls.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct tls_context {
 	struct scatterlist *partially_sent_record;
 	u16 partially_sent_offset;
 	unsigned long flags;
+	bool in_tcp_sendpages;
 
 	u16 pending_open_record_frags;
 	int (*push_pending_record)(struct sock *sk, int flags);
--- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ int tls_push_sg(struct sock *sk,
 	size = sg->length - offset;
 	offset += sg->offset;
 
+	ctx->in_tcp_sendpages = true;
 	while (1) {
 		if (sg_is_last(sg))
 			sendpage_flags = flags;
@@ -141,6 +142,8 @@ retry:
 	}
 
 	clear_bit(TLS_PENDING_CLOSED_RECORD, &ctx->flags);
+	ctx->in_tcp_sendpages = false;
+	ctx->sk_write_space(sk);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -210,6 +213,10 @@ static void tls_write_space(struct sock
 {
 	struct tls_context *ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
 
+	/* We are already sending pages, ignore notification */
+	if (ctx->in_tcp_sendpages)
+		return;
+
 	if (!sk->sk_write_pending && tls_is_pending_closed_record(ctx)) {
 		gfp_t sk_allocation = sk->sk_allocation;
 		int rc;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ