linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] cpufreq: tegra20: Remove unneeded check in tegra_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180518015916.u3i6ts4hwqbws6ma@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 07:29:16 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/11] cpufreq: tegra20: Remove unneeded check in
 tegra_cpu_init

On 17-05-18, 21:00, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Remove checking of the CPU number for consistency as it won't ever fail
> unless there is a severe bug in the cpufreq core.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 5 -----
>  1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> index 61f00d1cba26..147ae3e14f18 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c
> @@ -32,8 +32,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table freq_table[] = {
>  	{ .frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END },
>  };
>  
> -#define NUM_CPUS	2
> -
>  static struct clk *cpu_clk;
>  static struct clk *pll_x_clk;
>  static struct clk *pll_p_clk;
> @@ -119,9 +117,6 @@ static int tegra_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (policy->cpu >= NUM_CPUS)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	clk_prepare_enable(cpu_clk);
>  
>  	/* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh