| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1526638943-2110-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 11:22:18 +0100
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
will.deacon@....com, robin.murphy@....com,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] arm_pmu: Refactor maximum period handling
Each PMU defines their max_period of the counter as the maximum
value that can be counted. In order to support chaining of the
counters, change this parameter to indicate the counter width
to deduce the max_period. This will be useful to compute the
max_period for chained counters.
No functional changes.
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c | 4 ++--
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 2 +-
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 2 +-
6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c
index 1d7061a..d52a3fa 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v6.c
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static void armv6pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpu_pmu->stop = armv6pmu_stop;
cpu_pmu->map_event = armv6_map_event;
cpu_pmu->num_events = 3;
- cpu_pmu->max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1;
+ cpu_pmu->counter_width = 32;
}
static int armv6_1136_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int armv6mpcore_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpu_pmu->stop = armv6pmu_stop;
cpu_pmu->map_event = armv6mpcore_map_event;
cpu_pmu->num_events = 3;
- cpu_pmu->max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1;
+ cpu_pmu->counter_width = 32;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
index 870b66c..3d8ec6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
@@ -1171,7 +1171,7 @@ static void armv7pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpu_pmu->start = armv7pmu_start;
cpu_pmu->stop = armv7pmu_stop;
cpu_pmu->reset = armv7pmu_reset;
- cpu_pmu->max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1;
+ cpu_pmu->counter_width = 32;
};
static void armv7_read_num_pmnc_events(void *info)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c
index fcf218d..6eb0e21 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_xscale.c
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ static int xscale1pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpu_pmu->stop = xscale1pmu_stop;
cpu_pmu->map_event = xscale_map_event;
cpu_pmu->num_events = 3;
- cpu_pmu->max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1;
+ cpu_pmu->counter_width = 32;
return 0;
}
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static int xscale2pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpu_pmu->stop = xscale2pmu_stop;
cpu_pmu->map_event = xscale_map_event;
cpu_pmu->num_events = 5;
- cpu_pmu->max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1;
+ cpu_pmu->counter_width = 32;
return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index 85a251b..408f92c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -961,7 +961,7 @@ static int armv8_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
cpu_pmu->start = armv8pmu_start,
cpu_pmu->stop = armv8pmu_stop,
cpu_pmu->reset = armv8pmu_reset,
- cpu_pmu->max_period = (1LLU << 32) - 1,
+ cpu_pmu->counter_width = 32;
cpu_pmu->set_event_filter = armv8pmu_set_event_filter;
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
index 1a0d340..e23e1a1 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
@@ -28,6 +28,11 @@
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct arm_pmu *, cpu_armpmu);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_irq);
+static inline u64 arm_pmu_max_period(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
+{
+ return (((u64)1) << (pmu->counter_width)) - 1;
+}
+
static int
armpmu_map_cache_event(const unsigned (*cache_map)
[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
@@ -114,8 +119,10 @@ int armpmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
s64 left = local64_read(&hwc->period_left);
s64 period = hwc->sample_period;
+ u64 max_period;
int ret = 0;
+ max_period = arm_pmu_max_period(armpmu);
if (unlikely(left <= -period)) {
left = period;
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, left);
@@ -136,8 +143,8 @@ int armpmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
* effect we are reducing max_period to account for
* interrupt latency (and we are being very conservative).
*/
- if (left > (armpmu->max_period >> 1))
- left = armpmu->max_period >> 1;
+ if (left > (max_period >> 1))
+ left = (max_period >> 1);
local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, (u64)-left);
@@ -153,6 +160,7 @@ u64 armpmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
struct arm_pmu *armpmu = to_arm_pmu(event->pmu);
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
u64 delta, prev_raw_count, new_raw_count;
+ u64 max_period = arm_pmu_max_period(armpmu);
again:
prev_raw_count = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
@@ -162,7 +170,7 @@ u64 armpmu_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
new_raw_count) != prev_raw_count)
goto again;
- delta = (new_raw_count - prev_raw_count) & armpmu->max_period;
+ delta = (new_raw_count - prev_raw_count) & max_period;
local64_add(delta, &event->count);
local64_sub(delta, &hwc->period_left);
@@ -402,7 +410,7 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
* is far less likely to overtake the previous one unless
* you have some serious IRQ latency issues.
*/
- hwc->sample_period = armpmu->max_period >> 1;
+ hwc->sample_period = arm_pmu_max_period(armpmu) >> 1;
hwc->last_period = hwc->sample_period;
local64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
index 40036a5..c8c31cf 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ struct arm_pmu {
void (*reset)(void *);
int (*map_event)(struct perf_event *event);
int num_events;
- u64 max_period;
+ u8 counter_width;
bool secure_access; /* 32-bit ARM only */
#define ARMV8_PMUV3_MAX_COMMON_EVENTS 0x40
DECLARE_BITMAP(pmceid_bitmap, ARMV8_PMUV3_MAX_COMMON_EVENTS);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists