[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50c98169-1606-48bf-0489-124adefd2a54@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 21:04:40 +0800
From: Jia He <hejianet@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Suzuki.Poulose@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jia.he@...-semitech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: harden unmap_stage2_ptes in case
end is not PAGE_SIZE aligned
On 5/18/2018 5:48 PM, Marc Zyngier Wrote:
> On 18/05/18 10:27, Jia He wrote:
>> If it passes addr=0x202920000,size=0xfe00 to unmap_stage2_range->
>> ...->unmap_stage2_ptes, unmap_stage2_ptes will get addr=0x202920000,
>> end=0x20292fe00. After first while loop addr=0x202930000, end=0x20292fe00,
>> then addr!=end. Thus it will touch another pages by put_pages() in the
>> 2nd loop.
>>
>> This patch fixes it by hardening the break condition of while loop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: jia.he@...-semitech.com
>> ---
>> v2: newly added
>>
>> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> index 8dac311..45cd040 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static void unmap_stage2_ptes(struct kvm *kvm, pmd_t *pmd,
>>
>> put_page(virt_to_page(pte));
>> }
>> - } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>> + } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr < end);
>>
>> if (stage2_pte_table_empty(start_pte))
>> clear_stage2_pmd_entry(kvm, pmd, start_addr);
>>
>
> I don't think this change is the right thing to do. You get that failure
> because you're being passed a size that is not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
> That's the mistake.
>
> You should ensure that this never happens, rather than changing the page
> table walkers (which are consistent with the way this kind of code is
> written in other places of the kernel). As you mentioned in your first
> patch, the real issue is that KSM is broken, and this is what should be
> fixed.
>
Got it, thanks
Should I resend the patch 1/2 without any changes after droping patch 2/2?
--
Cheers,
Jia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists