[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <913e288c5aabf0224cedcf2eb0c9be309745eace.camel@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 14:13:47 +0000
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To: "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
CC: "deanbo422@...il.com" <deanbo422@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"nios2-dev@...ts.rocketboards.org" <nios2-dev@...ts.rocketboards.org>,
"linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org>,
"linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"green.hu@...il.com" <green.hu@...il.com>,
"openrisc@...ts.librecores.org" <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"monstr@...str.eu" <monstr@...str.eu>,
"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org" <linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] dma-mapping: provide a generic dma-noncoherent
implementation
Hi Christoph,
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 15:27 +0200, hch@....de wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 01:03:46PM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Note mmc_get_dma_dir() is just "data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE ? DMA_TO_DEVICE : DMA_FROM_DEVICE".
> > I.e. if we're preparing for sending data dma_noncoherent_map_sg() will have DMA_TO_DEVICE which
> > is quite OK for passing to dma_noncoherent_sync_sg_for_device() but in case of reading we'll have
> > DMA_FROM_DEVICE which we'll pass to dma_noncoherent_sync_sg_for_device() in dma_noncoherent_map_sg().
> >
> > I'd say this is not entirely correct because IMHO arch_sync_dma_for_cpu() is supposed to only be used
> > in case of DMA_FROM_DEVICE and arch_sync_dma_for_device() only in case of DMA_TO_DEVICE.
>
> arc overrides the dir paramter of the dma_sync_single_for_device/
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu calls. My patches dropped that, and I have
> restored that, and audit for the other architectures is pending.
Well at least for me that's a confusion what is a reason to pass direction
to function which purpose is already known.
I'd say that XXX_sync_for_device() doesn't need _variable_ direction as an argument,
otherwise what does that mean if we pass DMA_FROM_DEVICE to that function?
> That being said the existing arc code still looks rather odd as it
> didn't do the same thing for the scatterlist versions of the calls.
That might easily be the case so good we caught that now and it will be fixed :)
> I've thrown in a few patches into my new tree to make the sg versions
> make the normal calls, and to clean up the area a bit.
I'll try your newer series now, thanks!
-Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists