linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/10] don't use spin_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180518160132.GB22791@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 18 May 2018 09:01:32 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
        tytso@....edu, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, clm@...com,
        jbacik@...com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, willy@...radead.org,
        peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] don't use spin_lock_irqsave() unnecessarily

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 03:49:08AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>

Looks generally fine.  A little changelog with an explanation of
how we obviously never could get here with irqs disabled would
be nice, though.