[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf8bwUsMYYd1u1OSa=DGwJkOrZ4txqtFyRmX4OS4Qosrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 21:30:05 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zilstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Glexiner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Erick Reyes <erickreyes@...gle.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib: Add module to simulate atomic sections for
testing {preempt,irqs}off tracers
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 1:58 AM, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 12:09:46AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:59 AM, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com> wrote:
>> > + default n
>>
>> n _is_ default default.
>
> I would rather be explicit, several other TEST configs also mention it. Is it
> a strong desire to drop off default n?
I guess so, it comes from Linus. See, for example, commit
0192f17529fa clean up x86 platform driver default values
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists