linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] procfs: fix mmap() for /proc/vmcore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180519034338.GV30522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 19 May 2018 04:43:38 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     gor@...ux.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] procfs: fix mmap() for /proc/vmcore

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 08:33:37PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:20 PM Linus Torvalds <
> torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > I'd *much* rather just set FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET for /proc/vmcore _only_,
> > rather than open up all proc files to issues with 4G+ offsets.
> 
> Hmm. I was going to point to the s_maxbytes check in rw_verify_area() and
> ask you how that ever worked for that file, but it's not there, the
> s_maxbyte checks are only in lseek and in do_splice().
> 
> So apparently we protect against llseek + read/write, but we don't protect
> against pread64/pwrite64 having offset overflows..
> 
> That's crazy. That makes all the s_maxbytes protection much less effective
> than it should be. Filesystems that don't get the 64-bit case right will
> screw up pread64 and friends.
> 
> Al, I'm missing something. Did we always have this gaping hole where we
> didn't actually check s_maxbytes against read/write, only
> generic_file_llseek? Apparently.

Not quite.  The things like
        if (unlikely(*ppos >= inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes))
                return 0;
        iov_iter_truncate(iter, inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes);
protect most of the regular files (see mm/filemap.c).  And for devices (which is
where the majority of crap ->read()/->write() is) it's obviously not applicable -
->s_maxbytes of *what*?