[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180519074413.GB2952@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 09:44:13 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 17/28] x86/asm: use SYM_INNER_LABEL instead of GLOBAL
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 2:17 AM Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > GLOBAL had several meanings and is going away. In this patch, convert
> > all the inner function labels marked with GLOBAL to use SYM_INNER_LABEL
> > instead.
>
> > Note that retint_user needs not be global, perhaps since commit
> > 2ec67971facc ("x86/entry/64/compat: Remove most of the fast system call
> > machinery"), where entry_64_compat's caller was removed. So mark the
> > label as LOCAL.
>
>
> > -GLOBAL(entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe)
> > +SYM_INNER_LABEL(entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>
> I've missed all the context here. I agree that GLOBAL is misleading, and
> "inner label" is nice. But this is a rather wordy macro. Would:
>
> INNER_LABEL_GLOBAL(name)
>
> be better? (With just INNER_LABEL(name) for the local version?)
Please keep the SYM_ global namespace for all these symbol macros - but the rest
of the name can be shortened.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists