[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3505791.x6nWYTo8eb@z50>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 17:37:44 +0200
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...mer.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY..." <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] mtd: rawnand: ams-delta: use GPIO lookup table
On Sunday, May 20, 2018 4:44:31 PM CEST Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 12:55 AM, Janusz Krzysztofik
>
> <jmkrzyszt@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, May 19, 2018 8:00:38 PM CEST Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> NULL check in practice discards the _optional part of gpiod_get(). So,
> >> either you use non-optional variant and decide how to handle an
> >> errors, or user _optional w/o NULL check.
> >
> > OK, I'm going to use something like the below while submitting v2:
> >
> > - gpiod_rdy = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "rdy", GPIOD_IN);
> > - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(gpiod_rdy)) {
> > - this->dev_ready = ams_delta_nand_ready;
> > - } else {
> > - this->dev_ready = NULL;
> > - pr_notice("Couldn't request gpio for Delta NAND
> > ready.\n");
> > + priv->gpiod_rdy = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "rdy",
> > + GPIOD_IN);
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->gpiod_rdy)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(priv->gpiod_nwp);
> > + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "RDY GPIO request failed (%d)\n",
> > err); + goto err_gpiod;
> >
> > }
> >
> > + if (priv->gpiod_rdy)
> > + this->dev_ready = ams_delta_nand_ready;
>
> This makes sense.
>
> Though, I completely dislike "rdy" name of GPIO. Where is it documented?
No documentation files for Amstrad Delta nor for its NAND driver specifically
exist under Documentation/. However, there exist some for generic GPIO NAND
driver where the pin name "rdy" is used explicitly:
Documentation/driver-api/gpio/drivers-on-gpio.rst
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/gpio-control-nand.txt
You can find that mnemonic used across drivers/mtd/nand/, standalone or as a
suffix, including the Amstrad Delta NAND driver before the change discussed.
To be honest, I don't like it much either, but I'm just using it instead of
inventing something new.
Thanks,
Janusz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists