Message-ID: <7a5c644d-625e-a01e-a9a7-304eea13d225@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 May 2018 13:16:40 +0300
From:   Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, pombredanne@...b.com, stummala@...eaurora.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, guro@...com,
        mka@...omium.org, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
        chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, longman@...hat.com, minchan@...nel.org,
        ying.huang@...el.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, jbacik@...com,
        linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, willy@...radead.org, lirongqing@...du.com,
        aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/17] mm: Assign memcg-aware shrinkers bitmap to memcg

On 20.05.2018 10:27, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:42:37AM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>> Imagine a big node with many cpus, memory cgroups and containers.
>> Let we have 200 containers, every container has 10 mounts,
>> and 10 cgroups. All container tasks don't touch foreign
>> containers mounts. If there is intensive pages write,
>> and global reclaim happens, a writing task has to iterate
>> over all memcgs to shrink slab, before it's able to go
>> to shrink_page_list().
>>
>> Iteration over all the memcg slabs is very expensive:
>> the task has to visit 200 * 10 = 2000 shrinkers
>> for every memcg, and since there are 2000 memcgs,
>> the total calls are 2000 * 2000 = 4000000.
>>
>> So, the shrinker makes 4 million do_shrink_slab() calls
>> just to try to isolate SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages in one
>> of the actively writing memcg via shrink_page_list().
>> I've observed a node spending almost 100% in kernel,
>> making useless iteration over already shrinked slab.
>>
>> This patch adds bitmap of memcg-aware shrinkers to memcg.
>> The size of the bitmap depends on bitmap_nr_ids, and during
>> memcg life it's maintained to be enough to fit bitmap_nr_ids
>> shrinkers. Every bit in the map is related to corresponding
>> shrinker id.
>>
>> Next patches will maintain set bit only for really charged
>> memcg. This will allow shrink_slab() to increase its
>> performance in significant way. See the last patch for
>> the numbers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |   14 +++++
>>  mm/memcontrol.c            |  120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  mm/vmscan.c                |   10 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> index 996469bc2b82..e51c6e953d7a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
>> @@ -112,6 +112,15 @@ struct lruvec_stat {
>>  	long count[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
>>  };
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * Bitmap of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware shrinkers,
>> + * which have elements charged to this memcg.
>> + */
>> +struct memcg_shrinker_map {
>> +	struct rcu_head rcu;
>> +	unsigned long map[0];
>> +};
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * per-zone information in memory controller.
>>   */
>> @@ -125,6 +134,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
>>  
>>  	struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter	iter[DEF_PRIORITY + 1];
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>> +	struct memcg_shrinker_map __rcu	*shrinker_map;
>> +#endif
>>  	struct rb_node		tree_node;	/* RB tree node */
>>  	unsigned long		usage_in_excess;/* Set to the value by which */
>>  						/* the soft limit is exceeded*/
>> @@ -1261,6 +1273,8 @@ static inline int memcg_cache_id(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>>  	return memcg ? memcg->kmemcg_id : -1;
>>  }
>>  
>> +extern int memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id);
>> +
>>  #else
>>  #define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx)	\
>>  	for (; NULL; )
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index 023a1e9c900e..317a72137b95 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -320,6 +320,120 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcg_kmem_enabled_key);
>>  
>>  struct workqueue_struct *memcg_kmem_cache_wq;
>>  
>> +static int memcg_shrinker_map_size;
>> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
>> +
>> +static void memcg_free_shrinker_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
>> +{
>> +	kvfree(container_of(head, struct memcg_shrinker_map, rcu));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>> +					 int size, int old_size)
> 
> Nit: No point in passing old_size here. You can instead use
> memcg_shrinker_map_size directly.

This is made for the readability. All the actions with global variable
is made in the same function -- memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(), all
the actions with local variables are also in the same -- memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map().
Accessing memcg_shrinker_map_size in memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map()
looks not intuitive and breaks modularity. 

>> +{
>> +	struct memcg_shrinker_map *new, *old;
>> +	int nid;
>> +
>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
>> +
>> +	for_each_node(nid) {
>> +		old = rcu_dereference_protected(
>> +				memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map, true);
> 
> Nit: Sometimes you use mem_cgroup_nodeinfo() helper, sometimes you
> access mem_cgorup->nodeinfo directly. Please, be consistent.

Ok, will change.
 
>> +		/* Not yet online memcg */
>> +		if (!old)
>> +			return 0;
>> +
>> +		new = kvmalloc(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!new)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +		/* Set all old bits, clear all new bits */
>> +		memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_size);
>> +		memset((void *)new->map + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
>> +
>> +		rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map, new);
>> +		if (old)
>> +			call_rcu(&old->rcu, memcg_free_shrinker_map_rcu);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void memcg_free_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
>> +	struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
>> +	int nid;
>> +
>> +	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	for_each_node(nid) {
>> +		pn = mem_cgroup_nodeinfo(memcg, nid);
>> +		map = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
>> +		if (map)
>> +			kvfree(map);
>> +		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, NULL);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +	struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
>> +	int nid, size, ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
>> +	size = memcg_shrinker_map_size;
>> +	for_each_node(nid) {
>> +		map = kvzalloc(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!map) {
> 
>> +			memcg_free_shrinker_maps(memcg);
> 
> Nit: Please don't call this function under the mutex as it isn't
> necessary. Set 'ret', break the loop, then check 'ret' after releasing
> the mutex, and call memcg_free_shrinker_maps() if it's not 0.

No, it must be called under the mutex. See the race with memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map().
NULL maps are not expanded, and this is the indicator we use to differ memcg, which is
not completely online. If the allocations in memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps() fail at nid == 1,
then freeing of nid == 0 can race with expanding.
 
>> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +		rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map, map);
>> +	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(int nr)
> 
> Nit: Please pass the new shrinker id to this function, not the max
> number of shrinkers out there - this will look more intuitive. And
> please add a comment to this function. Something like:
> 
>   Make sure memcg shrinker maps can store the given shrinker id.
>   Expand the maps if necessary.
> 
>> +{
>> +	int size, old_size, ret = 0;
>> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>> +
>> +	size = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr, BITS_PER_BYTE);
> 
> Note, this will turn into DIV_ROUND_UP(id + 1, BITS_PER_BYTE) then.
> 
>> +	old_size = memcg_shrinker_map_size;
> 
> Nit: old_size won't be needed if you make memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map
> use memcg_shrinker_map_size directly.

This is made deliberately. Please, see above.

>> +	if (size <= old_size)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
>> +	if (!root_mem_cgroup)
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +
>> +	for_each_mem_cgroup(memcg) {
>> +		if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
>> +			continue;
>> +		ret = memcg_expand_one_shrinker_map(memcg, size, old_size);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto unlock;
>> +	}
>> +unlock:
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		memcg_shrinker_map_size = size;
>> +	mutex_unlock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +#else /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
>> +static int memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +static void memcg_free_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) { }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
>>  
>>  /**
>> @@ -4482,6 +4596,11 @@ static int mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>>  {
>>  	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
>>  
>> +	if (memcg_alloc_shrinker_maps(memcg)) {
>> +		mem_cgroup_id_remove(memcg);
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>> +
>>  	/* Online state pins memcg ID, memcg ID pins CSS */
>>  	atomic_set(&memcg->id.ref, 1);
>>  	css_get(css);
>> @@ -4534,6 +4653,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
>>  	vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);
>>  	cancel_work_sync(&memcg->high_work);
>>  	mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(memcg);
>> +	memcg_free_shrinker_maps(memcg);
>>  	memcg_free_kmem(memcg);
>>  	mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>> index 3de12a9bdf85..f09ea20d7270 100644
>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>> @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
>>  static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
> 
>> +static int memcg_shrinker_nr_max;
> 
> Nit: Please rename it to shrinker_id_max and make it store max shrinker
> id, not the max number shrinkers that have ever been allocated. This
> will make it easier to understand IMO.
>
> Also, this variable doesn't belong to this patch as you don't really
> need it to expaned mem cgroup maps. Let's please move it to patch 3
> (the one that introduces shrinker_idr).
> 
>>  
>>  static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>>  {
>> @@ -181,6 +182,15 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
>>  	ret = id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>  		goto unlock;
> 
>> +
>> +	if (id >= memcg_shrinker_nr_max) {
>> +		if (memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(id + 1)) {
>> +			idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
>> +			goto unlock;
>> +		}
>> +		memcg_shrinker_nr_max = id + 1;
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> Then we'll have here:
> 
> 	if (memcg_expaned_shrinker_maps(id)) {
> 		idr_remove(shrinker_idr, id);
> 		goto unlock;
> 	}
> 
> and from patch 3:
> 
> 	shrinker_id_max = MAX(shrinker_id_max, id);

So, shrinker_id_max contains "the max number shrinkers that have ever been allocated" minus 1.
The only difference to existing logic is "minus 1", which will be needed to reflect in
shrink_slab_memcg()->for_each_set_bit()...

To have "minus 1" instead of "not to have minus 1" looks a little subjective.

> 
>>  	shrinker->id = id;
>>  	ret = 0;
>>  unlock:
>>

Thanks,
Kirill

Powered by blists - more mailing lists