Message-ID: <CADZs7q5dDJS8Y+z=9B9-Z6ZXCGgeVtqEF6uPdTJrD10kUO-RWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 May 2018 15:52:17 +0200
From:   Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>
To:     Y Song <ys114321@...il.com>
Cc:     Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] bpf: tracing: new helper bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Y Song <ys114321@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Alban Crequy <alban.crequy@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>
> >
> > bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino() allows BPF trace programs to get the inode
> > of the cgroup where the current process resides.
> >
> > My use case is to get statistics about syscalls done by a specific
> > Kubernetes container. I have a tracepoint on raw_syscalls/sys_enter and
> > a BPF map containing the cgroup inode that I want to trace. I use
> > bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino() and I quickly return from the tracepoint if
> > the inode is not in the BPF hash map.
>
> Alternatively, the kernel already has bpf_current_task_under_cgroup helper
> which uses a cgroup array to store cgroup fd's. If the current task is
> in the hierarchy of a particular cgroup, the helper will return true.
>
> One difference between your helper and bpf_current_task_under_cgroup() is
> that your helper tests against a particular cgroup, not including its
> children, but
> bpf_current_task_under_cgroup() will return true even the task is in a
> nested cgroup.
>
> Maybe this will work for you?

I like the behaviour that it checks for children cgroups. But with the
cgroup array, I can test only one cgroup at a time. I would like to be
able to enable my tracer for a few Kubernetes containers or all by
adding the inodes of a few cgroups in a hash map. So I could keep
separate stats for each. With bpf_current_task_under_cgroup(), I would
need to iterate over the list of cgroups, which is difficult with BPF.

Also, Kubernetes is cgroup-v1 only and bpf_current_task_under_cgroup()
is cgroup-v2 only. In Kubernetes, the processes remain in the root of
the v2 hierarchy. I'd like to be able to select the cgroup hierarchy
in my helper so it'd work for both v1 and v2.

> > Without this BPF helper, I would need to keep track of all pids in the
> > container. The Netlink proc connector can be used to follow process
> > creation and destruction but it is racy.
> >
> > This patch only looks at the memory cgroup, which was enough for me
> > since each Kubernetes container is placed in a different mem cgroup.
> > For a generic implementation, I'm not sure how to proceed: it seems I
> > would need to use 'for_each_root(root)' (see example in
> > proc_cgroup_show() from kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c) but I don't know if
> > taking the cgroup mutex is possible in the BPF helper function. It might
> > be ok in the tracepoint raw_syscalls/sys_enter but could the mutex
> > already be taken in some other tracepoints?
>
> mutex is not allowed in a helper since it can block.

Ok. I don't know how to implement my helper properly then. Maybe I
could just use the 1st cgroup-v1 hierarchy (the name=systemd one) so I
don't have to iterate over the hierarchies. But would that be
acceptable?

Cheers,
Alban

> > Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy <alban@...volk.io>
> > ---
> >  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 11 ++++++++++-
> >  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index c5ec89732a8d..38ac3959cdf3 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -755,6 +755,14 @@ union bpf_attr {
> >   *     @addr: pointer to struct sockaddr to bind socket to
> >   *     @addr_len: length of sockaddr structure
> >   *     Return: 0 on success or negative error code
> > + *
> > + * u64 bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino(hierarchy, flags)
> > + *     Get the cgroup{1,2} inode of current task under the specified hierarchy.
> > + *     @hierarchy: cgroup hierarchy
>
> Not sure what is the value to specify hierarchy here.
> A cgroup directory fd?
>
> > + *     @flags: reserved for future use
> > + *     Return:
> > + *       == 0 error
>
> looks like < 0 means error.
>
> > + *        > 0 inode of the cgroup
>                >= 0 means good?
> >   */
> >  #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)          \
> >         FN(unspec),                     \
> > @@ -821,7 +829,8 @@ union bpf_attr {
> >         FN(msg_apply_bytes),            \
> >         FN(msg_cork_bytes),             \
> >         FN(msg_pull_data),              \
> > -       FN(bind),
> > +       FN(bind),                       \
> > +       FN(get_current_cgroup_ino),
> >
> >  /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
> >   * function eBPF program intends to call
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 56ba0f2a01db..9bf92a786639 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -524,6 +524,29 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_str_proto = {
> >         .arg3_type      = ARG_ANYTHING,
> >  };
> >
> > +BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino, u32, hierarchy, u64, flags)
> > +{
> > +       // TODO: pick the correct hierarchy instead of the mem controller
> > +       struct cgroup *cgrp = task_cgroup(current, memory_cgrp_id);
> > +
> > +       if (unlikely(!cgrp))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       if (unlikely(hierarchy))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +       if (unlikely(flags))
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       return cgrp->kn->id.ino;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino_proto = {
> > +       .func           = bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino,
> > +       .gpl_only       = false,
> > +       .ret_type       = RET_INTEGER,
> > +       .arg1_type      = ARG_DONTCARE,
> > +       .arg2_type      = ARG_DONTCARE,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct bpf_func_proto *
> >  tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> >  {
> > @@ -564,6 +587,8 @@ tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
> >                 return &bpf_get_prandom_u32_proto;
> >         case BPF_FUNC_probe_read_str:
> >                 return &bpf_probe_read_str_proto;
> > +       case BPF_FUNC_get_current_cgroup_ino:
> > +               return &bpf_get_current_cgroup_ino_proto;
> >         default:
> >                 return NULL;
> >         }
> > --
> > 2.14.3
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists