linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v2 07/12] fs/btrfs/extent_io: update usage of address zone modifiers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 May 2018 18:01:36 +0000
From:   Huaisheng HS1 Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>
To:     "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>
CC:     "mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "alexander.levin@...izon.com" <alexander.levin@...izon.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "colyli@...e.de" <colyli@...e.de>,
        NingTing Cheng <chengnt@...ovo.com>,
        Ocean HY1 He <hehy1@...ovo.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        "linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "clm@...com" <clm@...com>,
        "jbacik@...com" <jbacik@...com>,
        "dsterba@...e.com" <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 07/12] fs/btrfs/extent_io: update usage of address zone
 modifiers

Use __GFP_ZONE_MASK to replace (__GFP_DMA32 | __GFP_HIGHMEM).

In function alloc_extent_state, it is obvious that __GFP_DMA is not 
the expecting zone type.

___GFP_DMA, ___GFP_HIGHMEM and ___GFP_DMA32 have been deleted from GFP 
bitmasks, the bottom three bits of GFP mask is reserved for storing
encoded zone number.
__GFP_DMA, __GFP_HIGHMEM and __GFP_DMA32 should not be operated with
each others by OR. 

Signed-off-by: Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index dfeb74a..6653e9a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static struct extent_state *alloc_extent_state(gfp_t mask)
         * The given mask might be not appropriate for the slab allocator,
         * drop the unsupported bits
         */
-       mask &= ~(__GFP_DMA32|__GFP_HIGHMEM);
+       mask &= ~__GFP_ZONE_MASK;
        state = kmem_cache_alloc(extent_state_cache, mask);
        if (!state)
                return state;
-- 
1.8.3.1