[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87muwshl4z.fsf@xmission.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 14:19:24 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
luto@...nel.org, jlayton@...hat.com, carlos@...hat.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, simo@...hat.com,
eparis@...isplace.org, serge@...lyn.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ghak32 V2 13/13] debug audit: read container ID of a process
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com> writes:
> On Friday, March 16, 2018 5:00:40 AM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> Add support for reading the container ID from the proc filesystem.
>
> I think this could be useful in general. Please consider this to be part of
> the full patch set and not something merely used to debug the patches.
Only with an audit specific name.
As it is:
Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
The truth is the containerid name really stinks and is quite confusing
and does not imply that the label applies only to audit. And little
things like this make me extremely uncofortable with it.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists