[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180521210425.535594367@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 23:11:36 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 60/87] seccomp: Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
commit b849a812f7eb92e96d1c8239b06581b2cfd8b275 upstream
Use PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE in seccomp() because seccomp does not allow to
widen restrictions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static inline void spec_mitigate(struct
int state = arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(task, which);
if (state > 0 && (state & PR_SPEC_PRCTL))
- arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_DISABLE);
+ arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_set(task, which, PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE);
}
static inline void seccomp_assign_mode(struct task_struct *task,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists