linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.16 064/110] x86/bugs: Concentrate bug reporting into a separate function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180521210511.863181479@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 May 2018 23:12:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.16 064/110] x86/bugs: Concentrate bug reporting into a separate function

4.16-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>

commit d1059518b4789cabe34bb4b714d07e6089c82ca1 upstream

Those SysFS functions have a similar preamble, as such make common
code to handle them.

Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c |   46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c
@@ -314,30 +314,48 @@ retpoline_auto:
 #undef pr_fmt
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
-ssize_t cpu_show_meltdown(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+
+ssize_t cpu_show_common(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
+			char *buf, unsigned int bug)
 {
-	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_CPU_MELTDOWN))
+	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(bug))
 		return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n");
-	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
-		return sprintf(buf, "Mitigation: PTI\n");
+
+	switch (bug) {
+	case X86_BUG_CPU_MELTDOWN:
+		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI))
+			return sprintf(buf, "Mitigation: PTI\n");
+
+		break;
+
+	case X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V1:
+		return sprintf(buf, "Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization\n");
+
+	case X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2:
+		return sprintf(buf, "%s%s%s%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[spectre_v2_enabled],
+			       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB) ? ", IBPB" : "",
+			       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW) ? ", IBRS_FW" : "",
+			       spectre_v2_module_string());
+
+	default:
+		break;
+	}
+
 	return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n");
 }
 
+ssize_t cpu_show_meltdown(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	return cpu_show_common(dev, attr, buf, X86_BUG_CPU_MELTDOWN);
+}
+
 ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v1(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
-	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V1))
-		return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n");
-	return sprintf(buf, "Mitigation: __user pointer sanitization\n");
+	return cpu_show_common(dev, attr, buf, X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V1);
 }
 
 ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
-	if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2))
-		return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n");
-
-	return sprintf(buf, "%s%s%s%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[spectre_v2_enabled],
-		       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB) ? ", IBPB" : "",
-		       boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW) ? ", IBRS_FW" : "",
-		       spectre_v2_module_string());
+	return cpu_show_common(dev, attr, buf, X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2);
 }
 #endif