[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeFiEMN+q0FPuk4qTVEW_1oovHzVkV_Ydcm22SEMarvUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 00:43:21 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
"open list:TI WILINK WIRELES..." <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/33] iwlwifi: mvm: use match_string() helper
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:57 PM, Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com> wrote:
> match_string() returns the index of an array for a matching string,
> which can be used intead of open coded variant.
> int ret, bt_force_ant_mode;
>
> - for (bt_force_ant_mode = 0;
> - bt_force_ant_mode < ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str);
> - bt_force_ant_mode++) {
> - if (!strcmp(buf, modes_str[bt_force_ant_mode]))
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - if (bt_force_ant_mode >= ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str))
> + bt_force_ant_mode = match_string(modes_str,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(modes_str), buf);
One line?
> + if (bt_force_ant_mode < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
I would rather use
ret = match_string();
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
bt_force_... = ret;
But it's up tu Loca.
>
> ret = 0;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists