linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V3 2/3] efi: Introduce efi_queue_work() to queue any efi_runtime_service() on efi_rts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <FFF73D592F13FD46B8700F0A279B802F392AE61C@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 22:44:46 +0000
From:   "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:     "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lee Chun-Yi <jlee@...e.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
        Naresh Bhat <naresh.bhat@...aro.org>,
        "Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        "Matt Fleming" <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 2/3] efi: Introduce efi_queue_work() to queue any
 efi_runtime_service() on efi_rts_wq

> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 08:13:03PM -0700, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > +	/*								\
> > +	 * queue_work() returns 0 if work was already on queue,         \
> > +	 * _ideally_ this should never happen.                          \
> > +	 */								\
> > +	if (queue_work(efi_rts_wq, &efi_rts_work.work))
> 	\
> > +		flush_work(&efi_rts_work.work);
> 	\
> 
> Since you're _always_ going to wait for it, it is _much_ cheaper to put a
> completion in your actual work and wait for that.

Sure! I will change it.
I also noticed that flush_work() in turn calls wait_for_completion().

Will also wait for a couple of days before posting V4.

Regards,
Sai