linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 3/5] remoteproc: qcom: Split the head and tail of the q5v5-pil rproc reset function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97221658-49a9-a61f-75ea-41559222bb38@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 14:20:14 +0530
From:   Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>
To:     Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        sibis@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/5] remoteproc: qcom: Split the head and tail of the
 q5v5-pil rproc reset function

Hi Vinod,

Thanks for the review.

On 5/18/2018 5:52 PM, Vinod wrote:
> On 14-05-18, 16:16, Sricharan R wrote:
> 
>> +static int q6v5_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>> +{
>> +	u32 ret;
>> +	int val, i;
>> +
>> +	/* Assert resets, stop core */
>> +	val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_RESET_REG);
>> +	val |= Q6SS_CORE_ARES | Q6SS_BUS_ARES_ENABLE | Q6SS_STOP_CORE;
>> +	writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_RESET_REG);
>> +
>> +	/* BHS require xo cbcr to be enabled */
>> +	val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
>> +	val |= 0x1;
>> +	writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
> 
> consider adding a updatel macro which does read, update and write for you...
> 

 ok.

>> +
>> +	/* Read CLKOFF bit to go low indicating CLK is enabled */
>> +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR,
>> +				 val, !(val & BIT(31)), 1,
>> +				 HALT_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(qproc->dev,
>> +			"xo cbcr enabling timed out (rc:%d)\n", ret);
>> +		return ret;
>> +	}
>> +	/* Enable power block headswitch and wait for it to stabilize */
>> +	val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +	val |= QDSP6v56_BHS_ON;
>> +	writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +	val |= readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
> 
> why is this read required
> 

 It was a ditto of what was given in the programming sequence from HW folks.
 yeah, logically the readl does not look needed. Will remove and update.

>> +	udelay(1);
>> +
>> +	/* Put LDO in bypass mode */
>> +	val |= QDSP6v56_LDO_BYP;
>> +	writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +
>> +	/* Deassert QDSP6 compiler memory clamp */
>> +	val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +	val &= ~QDSP6v56_CLAMP_QMC_MEM;
>> +	writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +
>> +	/* Deassert memory peripheral sleep and L2 memory standby */
>> +	val |= Q6SS_L2DATA_STBY_N | Q6SS_SLP_RET_N;
>> +	writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +
>> +	/* Turn on L1, L2, ETB and JU memories 1 at a time */
>> +	val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL);
>> +	for (i = 19; i >= 0; i--) {
> 
> where is the magic number 19 coming from?
> 

 Its the total number of Q6's memory head/foot switch banks. Infact
 the magic was there even before my patch. But will add a Macro to fix it.

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation