[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1526993322.6491.7.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 14:48:42 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: UV: raw_spinlock conversion
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:46 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 11:14 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > If you suggest that I
> > should stop caring about UV than I do so. Please post a patch that adds
> > a dependency to UV on PREEMPT so that part of the architecture is
> > documented.
>
> Will do.
On second thought, no I won't. It's either already known, or it should
be, making any such submission smell funny.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists