[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180522135015.GF5512@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 15:50:15 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Alex G." <mr.nuke.me@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, alex_gagniuc@...lteam.com,
austin_bolen@...l.com, shyam_iyer@...l.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
"Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang" <zjzhang@...eaurora.org>,
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@...wei.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] acpi: apei: Rename ghes_severity() to
ghes_cper_severity()
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 08:38:39AM -0500, Alex G. wrote:
> > It looks like the *real* reason for this change is that you
> > re-introduce ghes_severity() as a different function in the second
> > patch.
>
> /me holds fist at Borislav
That was a misunderstanding with Rafael and me - we fixed it on IRC.
But this is not the real problem with your approach - it is the marking
of all PCIe errors as recoverable, regardless of the signature. That's a
no-no, IMO.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists