linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] enable early printing of hashed pointers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180522113327.4b003fff@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 11:33:27 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] enable early printing of hashed pointers


[ Steve is back from vacation ]

On Thu, 17 May 2018 08:41:58 +1000
"Tobin C. Harding" <me@...in.cc> wrote:

> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:13:48AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > I think the series looks good, although if Linus takes my last patch,
> > it may conflict badly with the third patch. I'll have to look into that.  
> 
> I applied your PR patch ontop of mainline (imitating Linus pulling) any
> yes patch 3 of this set has a merge conflict.
> 
> > Anyway, Andrew, you want to take this in your tree?  
> 
> I split this set up into it's current form because Ted offered to take
> it through his tree.  There has been no response from him though since
> doing so.  He has ack'ed the first 2 patches (that touch
> drivers/char/random.c and include/linux/random.c).

Hopefully Ted takes this then.

> 
> Since this is not overly urgent stuff is it easier for everyone involved
> if I wait until the PR to Linus goes through then rebase this, add the
> other vsprintf patch back onto the set and send it all to Andrew?

Linus already pulled my commit in his tree. You can base your latest
work on top of it and post it again. I'm sure Andrew could take it
after that.

> 
> Usual disclaimer about being a massive noob, please correct me if I am
> out of line.  My aim is to make the job of others more simple.

No worries, you're doing a fine job ;-)

-- Steve