[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <297885c2-2132-b4a7-e53f-85c82caee95a@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 11:29:47 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, <ast@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: check NULL for sk_to_full_sk()
On 2018/5/21 23:17, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 05/21/2018 12:55 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
>> like commit df39a9f106d5 ("bpf: check NULL for sk_to_full_sk() return value"),
>> we should check sk_to_full_sk return value against NULL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>> index 30d15e6..fd3fbeb 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup.h
>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int __cgroup_bpf_check_dev_permission(short dev_type, u32 major, u32 minor,
>> int __ret = 0; \
>> if (cgroup_bpf_enabled && sk && sk == skb->sk) { \
>> typeof(sk) __sk = sk_to_full_sk(sk); \
>> - if (sk_fullsock(__sk)) \
>> + if (__sk && sk_fullsock(__sk)) \
>> __ret = __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_skb(__sk, skb, \
>> BPF_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS); \
>> } \
>>
>
> Why is this needed ???
BPF_CGROUP_RUN_PROG_INET_EGRESS is called in ip_output
I just misunderstood, sorry for noise.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists