Message-ID: <1564615700.2786.1527013173112.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 May 2018 14:19:33 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrew Hunter <ahh@...gle.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] arm: Add restartable sequences support

----- On May 17, 2018, at 11:30 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com wrote:

[...]
> 
> Or as proposed by Boqun, we can simply call rseq_syscall in a CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
> ifdef. Given that this is a debug option, is it worth it to add the
> current->rseq
> test for NULL in assembly before the call, or do we want to favor simplicity ?
> 

Based on advice from Will Deacon, I alternatively tried to add a new TIF_RSEQ thread
flags, but unfortunately bits 1 through 8 are already used, and this is all that fits
in an immediate operand on arm32 for the fast-path thread flag syscall work mask check
in assembly.

So considering that this is a kernel debug option, I took the approach of adding a
call at the very beginning of return from syscall fast and slow paths, which is only
compiled in if CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ=y.

Does the following approach make sense ?


arm: Add syscall detection for restartable sequences

Syscalls are not allowed inside restartable sequences, so add a call to
rseq_syscall() at the very beginning of system call exiting path for
CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ=y kernel. This could help us to detect whether there
is a syscall issued inside restartable sequences.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
index 3c4f887..b427ef8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
@@ -39,12 +39,13 @@ saved_pc    .req    lr
 
        .section .entry.text,"ax",%progbits
        .align  5
-#if !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING))
+#if !(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) || IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CONTEXT_TRACKING) || \
+       IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ))
 /*
  * This is the fast syscall return path.  We do as little as possible here,
  * such as avoiding writing r0 to the stack.  We only use this path if we
- * have tracing and context tracking disabled - the overheads from those
- * features make this path too inefficient.
+ * have tracing, context tracking and rseq debug disabled - the overheads
+ * from those features make this path too inefficient.
  */
 ret_fast_syscall:
  UNWIND(.fnstart       )
@@ -71,14 +72,20 @@ fast_work_pending:
        /* fall through to work_pending */
 #else
 /*
- * The "replacement" ret_fast_syscall for when tracing or context tracking
- * is enabled.  As we will need to call out to some C functions, we save
- * r0 first to avoid needing to save registers around each C function call.
+ * The "replacement" ret_fast_syscall for when tracing, context tracking,
+ * or rseq debug is enabled.  As we will need to call out to some C functions,
+ * we save r0 first to avoid needing to save registers around each C function
+ * call.
  */
 ret_fast_syscall:
  UNWIND(.fnstart       )
  UNWIND(.cantunwind    )
        str     r0, [sp, #S_R0 + S_OFF]!        @ save returned r0
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ)
+       /* do_rseq_syscall needs interrupts enabled. */
+       mov     r0, sp                          @ 'regs'
+       bl      do_rseq_syscall
+#endif
        disable_irq_notrace                     @ disable interrupts
        ldr     r2, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
        cmp     r2, #TASK_SIZE
@@ -113,6 +120,12 @@ ENDPROC(ret_fast_syscall)
  */
 ENTRY(ret_to_user)
 ret_slow_syscall:
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ)
+       /* do_rseq_syscall needs interrupts enabled. */
+       enable_irq_notrace                      @ enable interrupts
+       mov     r0, sp                          @ 'regs'
+       bl      do_rseq_syscall
+#endif
        disable_irq_notrace                     @ disable interrupts
 ENTRY(ret_to_user_from_irq)
        ldr     r2, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
index 5879ab3..f09e9d66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
@@ -710,3 +710,10 @@ asmlinkage void addr_limit_check_failed(void)
 {
        addr_limit_user_check();
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
+asmlinkage void do_rseq_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+       rseq_syscall(regs);
+}
+#endif



-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists