[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180522191309.GA23615@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 12:13:09 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Manoj N. Kumar" <manoj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] block: Create scsi_sense.h for SCSI and ATAPI
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 01:09:41PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I think Martin and Christoph are objecting to moving the code to
> block/scsi_ioctl.h. I don't care too much about where the code is, but
> think it would be nice to have the definitions in a separate header. But
> if they prefer just pulling in all of SCSI for it, well then I guess
> it's pointless to move the header bits. Seems very heavy handed to me,
> though.
It might be heavy handed for the 3 remaining users of drivers/ide,
but as long as that stuff just keeps working I'd rather worry about
everyone else, and keep the scsi code where it belongs.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists