[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180523222428.GC23040@kmo-pixel>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 18:24:28 -0400
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
dev@...nvswitch.org, shli@...nel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] openvswitch: convert to genradix
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 05:34:01AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 09:18:19PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > the new generic radix trees have a simpler API and implementation, and
> > no limitations on number of elements, so all flex_array users are being
> > converted
>
> This doesn't really feel like it should be a flexarray / genradix user.
> It just wants to allocate a lot of buckets and use them. Maybe kvmalloc
> is the right approach for this user of flexarray?
Yeah probably, or a rhashtable.
Now that you mention it, I think the md code should definitely be using kvmalloc
too.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists