[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180523061536.GE20991@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 11:45:36 +0530
From: Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] PCI: qcom: add runtime pm support to pcie_port
On 18-05-18, 00:07, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 5897af7d3355..3f35098b71b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -1088,6 +1088,8 @@ static int qcom_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> struct qcom_pcie *pcie = to_qcom_pcie(pci);
> int ret;
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(pci->dev);
> +
> qcom_ep_reset_assert(pcie);
>
> ret = pcie->ops->init(pcie);
> @@ -1124,6 +1126,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
> phy_power_off(pcie->phy);
> err_deinit:
> pcie->ops->deinit(pcie);
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(pci->dev);
Wondering if there is a reason for sync put here?
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists