[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180523083040.GC4828@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 09:30:40 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@...rochip.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
richard.genoud@...il.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: at91-usart: add driver for at91-usart as spi
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:10:28AM +0300, Radu Pirea wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 08:04 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * Driver for AT91 USART Controllers as SPI
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2018 Microchip Technology Inc.
> > Make the entire block a C++ comment so it looks more intentional rather
> > tha mixing C and C++.
> I know it's ugly, but SPDX license identifier must be in a separate comment
> block.
No, it doesn't - it just needs to be the first line of the file.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists