[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180523100615.gxd35efqn3h6b55u@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 15:36:15 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google.)" <joelaf@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] schedutil: Allow cpufreq requests to be made even
when kthread kicked
On 23-05-18, 02:42, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Probably. But then Rafael is changing single policy to use the lock
> so then barrier wouldn't be needed at all. In that case, both mine
> and Rafael new patch can go into stable which handles your race (
> optimization == fix in this case :P )
Yeah, we discussed that offline.
Go get some sleep. There are no barriers in this world :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists